Deaton Explains Why Ruling in Ripple v. SEC Case Could Take 2 More Months

The ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over the alleged sale of unregistered securities is one of the most followed cases in the crypto community. The outcome of the case carries significant implications for the entire industry, and many are eagerly anticipating the ruling on the so-called summary judgment.

A ruling on this matter was expected on March 31, 2023, but it did not happen. Attorney James K. Filan, who has been closely following the case, has predicted that the ruling will come soon. However, Attorney John E. Deaton, who represents thousands of XRP holders as a friend of the court in the case, has clarified on Twitter that there was no deadline for Judge Analisa Torres to release the ruling and that it could take another 30 to 60 days.

Deaton explained that there was no deadline for the judge to rule on the summary judgment, as only motions that have been pending for over six months must be reported on a list to Congress. The ruling in the Ripple case has been pending for a little over three months, so it does not fall under this category. Both parties filed all the necessary documents in the case on January 20, 2023.

Historically, Judge Torres has issued her ruling on summary judgment within months of her ruling on Daubert’s motions. Deaton expects a ruling to come within 30 to 60 days, as per his previous experience with such cases. In the meantime, the crypto community will continue to wait anxiously for the outcome of the case.

The SEC claims that Ripple’s sale of XRP to raise capital violated securities laws, arguing that the crypto asset should have been registered as an unregistered security. Ripple and the XRP community disagree, arguing that XRP is a digital currency and not a security.

This legal battle has been going on for two years and has gained significant attention from the crypto community. The outcome of the case could significantly impact the regulatory landscape of the crypto industry, as it will set a precedent for how digital assets are classified and regulated in the United States.

Ripple has been actively fighting the SEC’s allegations, arguing that the SEC’s actions have caused significant harm to XRP holders and the crypto industry as a whole. The company has also pointed out that other countries, including the United Kingdom and Japan, have already classified XRP as a digital currency and not a security.

Many in the crypto community believe that the SEC’s case against Ripple is based on outdated laws and regulations that do not adequately address the unique nature of digital assets. Crypto industry leaders have called for clearer regulations that provide greater clarity around how digital assets like XRP should be classified and regulated.

In the meantime, the crypto industry will continue to watch this case closely and await the outcome of the summary judgment. The ruling could have far-reaching implications for the industry, impacting not only how digital assets are regulated but also investor confidence and the overall growth of the crypto market.

As the case continues, many are calling for regulators and legislators to work together with industry leaders to create a more favorable regulatory environment for digital assets. With clearer regulations, the crypto industry can continue to grow and evolve, providing new opportunities for investors and businesses alike.


Related Posts